Course Description

The conventional story on war- and peacemaking almost always speaks of great deeds by Great Men. It tells how genius generals win wars and how skillful diplomats strike peace deals; how heroic soldiers fight and how selfless peacemakers unite; and, crucially, how wars end where peace begins and vice versa. Inspired by Tolstoy’s narrative of war as an assemblage of serendipity and chance, this course will look at war/peace beyond the lens of rationality and of strategic interests. Following Latour’s reading of Tolstoy, it will introduce a less anthropocentric and – hopefully - more pluralistic perspective by allowing other actors to make peace/war, such as UN reports and US drones, reconciliation workshops and surveillance techniques, etc. Building on Foucault’s inversion of Clausewitz, it will explore war as a general grid through which modern society can be analyzed even – and especially - during so-called peacetime.

Wednesday, March 5, 2014

Walter Solon - entry no 3 - Masco


In his essay Bad Weather, Joseph Masco attempts to identify a linear continuity between Cold War-Era atomic discourse and contemporary climate change awareness in US security discourse and American public consciousness. Using the method of discourse analysis, he relies on disclosed or public documents/speeches by American authorities, from which he quotes excerpts and stresses the sentences that are most revealing of the US state security apparatus creed, and, analogously, he uses pictures of the representation of an atomic experimental test, Hollywood post-apocalyptic films, photographs of the Earth from the Apollo mission (and a modified version where “only the southern tip of South America remains visible to sunlight”) and satellite photographs of Hurricane Katrina as the matter forming cultural representation of catastrophe. In the very beginning of the text, a nuclear test conducted against a synthetic forest in the Nevada desert is evoked as a parable embedded with aesthetic force. The idea of the sublime can be traced back to German romanticism, especially in Schopenhauer’s definition of the sublime as the visual experience containing a potential violence to destroy the viewer; for Schopenhauer, the stronger the sublime potential of an image, also more magnificent is nature’s predominance over humans. But the atomic sublime is “uncanny”, that is, in Freudian understanding, unprecedented yet familiar: ironically, the atomic sublime as understood by Masco operates in an inverse way as Schopenhauer’s sublime, for the main thesis defended in the article is that the destructive force of nature, present in climatic disasters, is in fact a direct consequence of industrialization. Therefore, to reverse this scenario and ensure the biosphere’s security, national security should be replaced with a “planetary vision of sustainability.”
The main focus of Masco’s attention is US state security policy. Ultimately, it’s the only field endowed with enough power to perform change. As stated in the last phrase of the article, which I find revealing and paradoxical, “securing the biosphere requires nothing less than a post-national vision of American power.” Even if Masco denounces the limitation of US security to fully acknowledge the international dimensions and implications of climate threat, he still cannot move away from American power as only possible realm or agent capable of transformative action. Other limited understandings of causality and power mark the whole text and are, in my view, prejudicial to his arguments. The view that military enterprise is the force behind: progress, technology, science and industrialization feels too simplistic. His idea of “state” is that of a formless evil entity, devoid of people and with no other rationale than the maximization of its own power. That said, regardless of the great influence of Foucauldian vocabulary and concepts that abound in the text, Masco still shares a realistic view of international relations of Hobbesian, Machiavellian, Clausewitzian tradition. But, contradictorily, he expresses an anti-Western, anti-Enlightenment, anti-technology disregard for technology present in many contemporary post-Foucauldian theorists or ecology activists. In sum, Masco retained the worst part of realism as well as the worst part of Foucault. He portrays two types of science, an evil one described as “geophysics”, serving the interests of the national state, and a good one, understood as “biology”, anti-industrial and defending the general survival of humanity. Even if this tension between national interests and planetary (i.e., humanity’s) interests is at the core of the article, Masco’s exclusive focus on America is a structural problem. The insistence on Cold War mentality as a total signifier still present in contemporary American politics is not convincing; similarly, the at certain points evoked analogy or equivalence between terror threat, atomic threat and climate threat is not sufficiently explored, taken as granted or itself subject to the propaganda paranoia that seems to exist in Western nations of the Northern Hemisphere. 

No comments:

Post a Comment