Course Description

The conventional story on war- and peacemaking almost always speaks of great deeds by Great Men. It tells how genius generals win wars and how skillful diplomats strike peace deals; how heroic soldiers fight and how selfless peacemakers unite; and, crucially, how wars end where peace begins and vice versa. Inspired by Tolstoy’s narrative of war as an assemblage of serendipity and chance, this course will look at war/peace beyond the lens of rationality and of strategic interests. Following Latour’s reading of Tolstoy, it will introduce a less anthropocentric and – hopefully - more pluralistic perspective by allowing other actors to make peace/war, such as UN reports and US drones, reconciliation workshops and surveillance techniques, etc. Building on Foucault’s inversion of Clausewitz, it will explore war as a general grid through which modern society can be analyzed even – and especially - during so-called peacetime.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Danièle Saint-Ville-Leplé - Entry n.6 (Khalili)


Laleh Khalili’s text is an extract from her book Time in the Shadows, Confinement in Counterinsurgencies. The text is the fourth chapter of this work. This chapter is titled "Invisible prisons, proxy-run prisons". Laleh Khalili investigates here the illeberal secret processes put in place by the US (War on terror against terrorism) and Israel (occupation of Palestine). Both sovereign states are in a logic of counterinsurgency.

The very definition of insurgency is to be hard to isolate from the surrounding population. The processes implied by both states include incarceration without trials and  even torture (for example in Khiyam). The use of proxy is characteristic. 

Proxies provide the mechanisms of concealment and denial by the State. A proxy may be an informal militia or  a sovereign state’s secret services. Proxies create a space of uncertainty where responsibilities for actions do not appear easily. The sovereign state itself does not appear to take in charge violent actions and uses  the legal ambiguities of juridiction and accountability.

The heart of the matter is to create zones of invisibility, to « relegate detainees to invisibility and inaudibility » (p.128), in unidentified black sites. The combination ofinvisibility and deniabilitu allows secret services to perform interrogations that would be considered illegal otherwise. The politics of intelligence needs such a space to which the press has no access.

No comments:

Post a Comment